Scotland the Brief

All you need to know about Scotland's economy, its finances, independence and Brexit.

Type of Resource
book
Primary Author or Creator
Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp
Additional Author(s) / Creators
Business for Scotland

The Politics of Scotland’s Public Finances

The early operation of the 2016 Scottish Fiscal Framework and the divergence of UK and Scottish income tax rates highlights the practical issues of devolved tax policy in the context of UK fiscal centralization. 

Type of Resource
Academic Paper
Primary Author or Creator
David Heald
Additional Author(s) / Creators
Michael Keating,

Ambiguous no more: Time to de-mystify the Barnett Formula

The overall effect of the new Barnett funding system is to place Scotland in a vulnerable position, where it is at much greater risk of falling into a cycle of economic decline relative to the rest of the UK.

Type of Resource
Academic Paper
Primary Author or Creator
J. R. Cuthbert

The Barnett Formula

The Barnett formula calculates the annual change in the block grant. The formula doesn’t determine the total size of the block grant just the yearly change. For devolved services, the Barnett formula aims to give each country the same pounds-per-person change in funding.

Type of Resource
Briefing paper
Date Published
Primary Author or Creator
Matthew Keep
Additional Author(s) / Creators
House of Commons Library

Barnett formula

The Barnett formula is a mechanism used by the Treasury in the UK to automatically adjust the amounts of public expenditure allocated to Northern IrelandScotland and Wales to reflect changes in spending levels allocated to public services in England. The formula applies to a large proportion, but not the

Type of Resource
Wikipedia
Primary Author or Creator
Wikipedia

PARTING WAYS How Scotland and the remaining UK could negotiate the separation of debts and assets

All of the plausible negotiating strategies represent clear advantages for an independent Scotland.  Even the least advantageous (the Annual Solidarity Payment) presents a scenario where Scotland would save around £1.5 billion per year in debt interest payments compared to that currently assigned to Scotland in GERS.

Type of Resource
Policy Paper
Primary Author or Creator
Craig Dalzell
Additional Author(s) / Creators
Scottish Independence Convention

Scotland spends 20% more per head on public services than England

t’s correct that spending on public services in Scotland is 20% higher per head than in England. But this money comes from the block grant from the UK Treasury, rather than from England specifically. An increasing proportion of the Scottish government’s budget also comes from taxes it raises

Type of Resource
Fact check
Date Published
Primary Author or Creator
Claire Milne
Additional Author(s) / Creators
Full fact

Would an independent Scotland have to keep the pound and cut public spending?

A report suggests an independent Scotland would have to make public expenditure reduction.  he report actually says that public spending could continue to grow. This does depend on sufficient growth in the economy after independence.

Type of Resource
Fact check
Date Published
Primary Author or Creator
Joël Reland
Additional Author(s) / Creators
Full fact

HS2 will not cost Scotland £17 billion

There is no evidence for the claim that HS2 will cost Scotland. In effect, all money spent by Scotland on HS2 is returned through the Barnett formula.

Type of Resource
Fact check
Date Published
Primary Author or Creator
Full Fact
Additional Author(s) / Creators
Add additional Authors and/or Publisher

What are the implications of independence for public revenues and spending?

There is no question that an independent Scotland could run a sustainable budget. But like the UK, an independent Scotland would face major fiscal challenges both in the short and long run. Based upon the latest data, an independent Scotland is likely to face greater challenges than the UK as a whole (at least in the short-term).

Type of Resource
Assessment report
Primary Author or Creator
Graeme Roy
Additional Author(s) / Creators
David Eiser, Centre on Constitutional Change